Compounding growth from a learning system
Studio sits between what your startup knows and the customers it wants to win.
Built by operators behind Atlas Metrics, Flip, gyde and teamly. Studio is their process, turned into a system.
You raised on a growth story. Now you have to build it.
The whole picture lives in your head.
Some of it is written down, in a deck and a Slack thread from March.
None of it is where the work happens.
Open it, and know the one thing to do now.
It pulls your whole system onto one surface, and keeps watching for what changes.
Inside the dashboardThe message is the easy part. The moment is not.
Not a better email — a better moment.
If they are not in a buying cycle, nothing you write will land. So it watches your accounts for months rather than moments, and stages a message only when the problem you fix has just become live there.
How Orbit finds the momentTwo RevOps roles opened and pulled since May, and now this one. Usually the point where reporting has outgrown the workaround but nobody owned it yet. Whoever takes it spends their first quarter reconciling rather than building. We do the consolidation before they start, so they get one source instead of nine. Worth ten minutes while the seat is empty?
You gave it your context once. It has been adding to that ever since.
Change one line later, and twenty-four things behave differently.
What the nine steps coverIt knows more about your market every week.
Six months in, it knows your market better than you did at the start.
The same file, six months apart. All of it aimed at your targets.
Nothing goes out until you say so.
Everything it produces is staged where it belongs: an email in your inbox, a sequence in your sender, a LinkedIn message, a post ready to publish. You approve it and you send it, from your own tools.
- It will not invent a number
- It will not make a claim you have not approved
- It will not use anyone's personal circumstances
- It will not chase volume, or approach the same person twice
Saw you're hiring a Head of RevOps to own reporting across a fragmented stack…
Congrats on the RevOps search. One thing worth knowing before they start…
Why you can trust it when it sounds confident.
None of it makes the output cautious. It is what makes the confident parts worth acting on.
It dates when something happened, not when it found it.
A job listing that is still live is not one posted last week.
It knows the difference between a big signal and a clear one.
A funding round tells you less about timing than one line in a job description.
It tells you what it is assuming, and what that costs you if it is wrong.
The Northwind draft said it in one line: one data point, and the role could sit unfilled for a quarter.
It refuses to learn from six data points.
A reply rate from six replies is a guess wearing a number's clothes.
None of it came from a prompt.
It is two decades of selling and building early-stage companies, written down as rules the system has to follow.
It is not another tab.
Runs inside your own Claude account.
Your tools, your credentials, your account. Nothing gets migrated. And everything it knows is plain text in your own folder, so you can read it, correct a line, and take it with you.
## ICP B2B SaaS · 20–120 staff · Series A Trigger: first RevOps hire ## Voice Short sentences. No adjective stacks. Never say "seamless" or "unlock" ## Approved claims One source instead of nine — nine more lines —
Your first hire is good in their first week.
Your company DNA is their onboarding document.
Briefed before the meeting. Coached after it. Every call they have adds to what everyone else works from.
Your marketing sounds like your sales, because it comes from the same place.
Two or three sourced angles a week.
Marketing with StudioIt reads your buyer's world, then drafts in your voice citing only claims you have approved.
Saw you're hiring a Head of RevOps to own reporting across a fragmented stack. That's usually the point where reporting has outgrown the workaround. We handle the consolidation, so whoever takes the role starts with one source rather than nine. Worth ten minutes before they start?
Hiring a Head of RevOps is rarely about reporting. It is about the moment reporting outgrew the workaround, and everyone quietly agreed to live with nine sources instead of one. The new hire inherits that agreement. Worth deciding what they walk into before they arrive.
Built for the stage where you are still selling it yourself.
Pre-seed, seed or Series A
Selling B2B
Two to twenty people
Still writing the outreach that matters yourself
You already run a mature AI go-to-market stack
You have a sales floor rather than a sales team
You are entirely self-serve
Or you want something that sends while you sleep
Built and scaled from the inside.
Every one of these companies had just raised too.
5× ARR in 14 months, every growth function built across Europe. Acquired by Novata.
Sales organisation built from scratch, ARR grown more than 20× in two years, then a $30M Series A. Customers today include Bosch, Porsche and McDonald's.
Sales structure and go-to-market strategy built after a successful seed round with LEA Partners and Mätch VC.
Scalable outbound structure built and sales team expansion guided.
Readied for acquisition, then sold.
Built inside a larger group.
Six companies. Two exits. All of it done by people, in the years before Studio existed.
Studio is that process, turned into a system.
If you want us in the room.
Studio works on its own and most people run it that way. If you would rather have the people who built it working alongside you, there are advisory and training packages. Places are limited.
What happens when you get in touch.
First staged moves inside a week.
A call
What you sell, what you have wired up, what you are aiming at.
Install
Runs in your own Claude account, so you will need a Claude subscription.
Your company DNA
Nine guided steps. A couple of hours at most, and you only do it once.
Your first week
Your watch list goes in and the board starts filling.